디자인 포트폴리오 구성·첨삭

# Modular Desk Lamp — Fictional Showcase Storyboard> Demonstration project only. All product details, observations, measurements, and outcomes are fictional placeholders for showing the portfolio workflow. They are not user research or engineering evidence.## Case thesisFor people who shift between focused work and video calls in compact home workspaces, this concept explores a repairable task light whose head, arm, and base can be reconfigured without replacing the whole product. The proposition remains to validate with direct user research, prototypes, photometric testing, and engineering review.## Page plan| Page | Layout | Question answered | Key message | Evidence treatment ||---:|---|---|---|---|| 1 | ID01 | What is this portfolio about? | Product judgment should remain visible from evidence to resolution. | Showcase disclosure on page || 2 | ID16 | What is the project thesis? | A modular light could adapt to changing desk routines and simplify repair. | Concept proposition, E0 || 3 | ID02 | Who, what role, and what constraints? | Compact workspace, individual concept project, repairability and reach constraints. | All fields marked fictional || 4 | ID03 | What behaviors might matter? | Screen glare, camera lighting, and limited desk depth are hypotheses to investigate. | Synthetic scenarios, E0 || 5 | ID04 | What is the provisional insight? | The light source may need to move between task, ambient, and call modes. | Assumption, not research finding || 6 | ID06 | Which routes were explored? | Clamp, weighted base, and rail-mounted modular directions. | Concept alternatives, E0 || 7 | ID07 | Why select one route? | Weighted base route balances portability, stability, and service access. | Illustrative criteria, E0 || 8 | ID08 | How should it look and feel? | Quiet cylindrical joints, tactile controls, replaceable color sleeve. | Design intent || 9 | ID10 | How might it be constructed? | Separable light head, arm, power module, and base. | Concept architecture; not engineering evidence || 10 | ID12 | What should a prototype test? | Reach envelope, tipping margin, joint effort, and glare control. | Validation plan only || 11 | ID13 | What changed after review? | Shorter lower arm and wider base are proposed to improve stability. | Illustrative iteration, not measured result || 12 | ID14 | What is the resolved concept? | One platform supports task lighting, calls, and component replacement. | AI-assisted or rendered concept must be disclosed || 13 | ID15 | What remains unknown? | Ergonomics, optics, thermal behavior, cost, and repair workflow need testing. | Explicit unresolved gaps || 14 | ID18 | Who made it and where to follow up? | Demonstration attribution and project links. | No fabricated contact details |## Planned visual assets| File | Page | Intended content | Status ||---|---:|---|---|| `images/generated/lamp-04-scenarios-sheet.webp` | 4 | Three clearly labeled synthetic desk scenarios | Complete || `images/generated/lamp-06-concepts-sheet.webp` | 6 | Three concept routes shown at matched scale | Complete || `images/generated/lamp-08-cmf.webp` | 8 | Form and CMF study | Complete || `images/generated/lamp-09-conceptual-architecture.webp` | 9 | Concept exploded view with disclosure | Complete || `images/generated/lamp-10-validation-plan.webp` | 10 | Prototype and test-plan diagram | Complete || `images/generated/lamp-11-iteration-pair.webp` | 11 | Before/after concept comparison | Complete || `images/generated/lamp-12-final-hero.webp` | 12 | Final product hero visualization | Complete |## Completion gate for the showcase- Keep a visible “fictional demonstration project” label on the cover and evidence pages.- Never rewrite synthetic scenarios as interviews, observations, or tested outcomes.- Label generated visuals as `AI-assisted concept visualization` when used.- Validate `portfolio_manifest.json` and the finished HTML.- Review all 14 pages at desktop, narrow width, and print/PDF size.