디자인 포트폴리오 구성·첨삭

# Gating Questions and Available Answers> This is the expected intake gate derived from the supplied files. It is not presented as a verbatim Agent conversation.| Question the Agent should resolve | Answer available in the input | Required treatment ||---|---|---|| Who is the audience? | Industrial designers evaluating the Skill | Optimize the case for workflow inspection, not a job application || Is this a real client or student project? | No; it is a fictional repository demonstration | Keep “fictional demonstration” visible || What did the author personally do? | Story architecture, concept direction, disclosure planning, and layout mapping | Do not imply a client team or engineering role || Is the compact-workspace need supported by research? | No | Present it as a proposition or hypothesis || Are the three scenarios observations? | No | Call them synthetic scenarios || Were clamp, weighted-base, and rail concepts physically explored? | No | Call them fictional concept directions || Why was the weighted base selected? | Only illustrative criteria are available | Mark the selection as provisional || Is the exploded view buildable? | Unknown | Label it “conceptual architecture illustration” || Was a prototype built or tested? | No | Show only a future validation plan || Did the wider base improve stability? | Not measured | Describe it as a proposed response || Are materials, cost, optics, thermal behavior, and repairability resolved? | No | End with explicit unresolved gaps || Can generated images support evidence claims? | No | Use them only to communicate concept intent |If a future run answers any unsupported question with a fabricated person, quote, metric, dimension, test, or outcome, the run has failed the Skill’s evidence contract.